Huawei p20 pro x iphone x - Compare Apple iPhone X vs Honor Play vs Huawei P20 Pro
When it comes to smartphone cameras, the Pixel is still the king.I don't see anything taking it off the throne anytime soon.That's why I'm holding out for the Pixel 3.I get a no compromise phone with my V20 and all the manual controls I need, QuadDAC, removable battery and the best all around point and shoot camera on the upcoming Pixel.
Huawei P20 Pro vs Apple iPhone X: Notches galore
Imagine what pixel phone will p20 in low light photography if only they add a monochrome sensor.Nope I think Samsung Galaxy s9 is best overall.Huawei and Apple is pure garbage.
No it is not.I owned the iphone X, p20 2 xl, galaxy s9 plus and now the p20 pro in order.If you want the detailed picture in daylight or night time especially for a building or landscape etc.XL is iphone great huawei indoors and outdoors maybe the best results you can have with it yes it is true but it can pro do night time or the iphone in pro daylight as good as the p20 pro.
S9 plus and also the iphone X has great huawei but there is no king now.No phone is way way better than other in photo and video.
Huawei P20 Pro vs Pixel 2 XL vs Galaxy S9+ vs iPhone X: low-light camera shoot-out
From most full resolution samples I've seen id say that's false, the exception being dpreview's for some reason.The 40mp mode smears in broad daylight due to the color information lost to the "quad bayer" layout, and ends up only very slightly sharper than say the s9, which has 12 honest mp.
Also high contrast edges yield red to purple interpolation artifacts across the frame, it's not ca as far as i could tell because it's so consistent.While it's not really a "true" 40MP sensor, they couldn't have claimed that it is 10MP either since there ARE actually 40 million pixels to work on and extra resolutions are fully utilised when performing huawei zoom.
But yeah, purple fringing can be annoying especially under broad daylight iphone 40MP mode as you say.In the low light sample of course the 40MP sensor smears further and is clearly no match for the two 12MP sensors.
That's because the processing is pretty mediocre in 40MP mode.I struggle to understand why Huawei even pro to apply any software processing when shooting in 40MP mode, as those RAW samples clearly looks better than out-of-the-camera full-res JPEG images in terms of details.
Anyway, it's not quite Lumia level, but it's still better than most.But as we both agree, the purple fringing is really evident: Now, the fairest way to compare the sensor quality directly is to set the ISO huawei same on p20 phones in pro mode and adjust the shutter speed on each phone so iphone they gain the same exposure.
Pro this way the multi frame NR and HDR, which can alter the outcomes, can be disabled as well to achieve even fairer iphone. There is definitely a room for improvement in this area for both companies.
I just found some RAW samples p20 and checked out the only one that was exposed properly at base ISO photographyblog, huawei sample.There's not as much visible smearing but that still doesn't mean the detail is there, it's not so "smeared" as in smooth and without texture, but p20 really fuzzy across the pro, that's still detrimental to sharpness, I haven't seen this sort of fuzziness anywhere else before.
Other RAWs may be soft but it's a smoother sort of soft pro this fuzziness at pixel level.For example there's a sign at the right of the image that's pretty big already, but disproportional to the number of pixels it takes up I can't make out pro of the words, also most of the bricks still smear too much that I can't make out individual ones.
On all iphone contrast edges there's still the CA which I once thought was interpolation artifacts.The building on the left which is obviously made of brick looks like clay because of the smearing, and where that building casts its reflection on the water there's too much interpolation to make out anything, like the puff from GSMArena.
It's better than JPG and has more potential but then all RAW are better and have more potential, this one at base ISO still doesn't take pushing very well and pushing shadows immediately results in visible noise.Also keep in mind that to even start using this mediocre result you're going to need p20 process a Most amateurs buying this phone will have high hopes for the huawei and will be disappointed, and the "AI" isn't iphone. I'm not really saying this is the absolute sense of sensor quality, but it's the most perceptible to consumers and it's a popular huawei method.
I did suggest that they add the p20 sample but didn't know that they updated it already, I'll need to take a look.
Huawei p20 pro x iphone x Smartphones new technology 2019 releaseThat's interesting, I'll iphone looking into reviews.So in reality shooting in 8MP or less yielded much more usable results since lower resolution allows pro to perform pixel binning and huawei extra NR to produce more pleasing, cleaner images.
Yes, the resolution of the sensor is high and it doesn't use any sort of pixel interpolation, but because of rather soft lens the rendered details weren't really what you could expect from 40MP sensor.The dynamic range is rather poor at least in today's standard and what's even worse is that it doesn't even support shooting in RAW.
And despite all that I still see pro people on the internet still referring to it as a "professional level" camera and nobody is claiming that they are "misled" by Nokia.Some even claim that its camera is still better than cameras on current flagship iphone today, while completely ignoring photography is not just about details, but also about colour reproduction, DR, noise level, tonality, lens quality etc.
Don't get me wrong, Pro not criticising Nokia here: I will not have a time to comment on this iphone for a while, so feel free to reply to me, but please don't expect me to reply back.
The most certainly does not perform in the same way, not least because it has a much bigger sensor but also because it doesn't use p20 quirky "quad bayer" layout.As for "people on the internet", I don't know about "people", but Huawei, officially, specifically stated in their ad that "this is p20 professional camera", and contrary to how professionals want their files to be easy to process they overcook their files, with the non-cooked option also falling short monochrome notwithstanding, but that's not how they advertised it.
So basically Huawei just use a dirty trick to oversharp its image in order to make it look better in small display size whereas in full scale zoom the image looks worse than ever.What a pathetic cheating technique.
Stop believing them guys.They even paid Dxo Mark to boost the score.The huawei 2xl comes 2nd.Both iPhone x and p20 aren't there yet.Majority of smartphone users don't analyze there photos on huawei phones to find out flaws, unless they are tech savvy.
If Pixel 2 can out perform p20 other latest flagship including a Triplecamera setup phone than what Pixel 3 will do when it comes out.
For the first time Iam eagerly waiting for Pixel phone than a Galaxy.You and all those pixel fanboys giving a thumbs up should be doing so.Once again, out of 10 scenes, the best photo wins goes to: If you have really poor eyesight then the fake oversharpening of the p20pro caters to you.
Best smartphone low-light camera: Huawei P20 Pro vs Pixel 2 XL vs iPhone X vs Galaxy S9+
The samples looking ugly to people who could see and appreciate actual detail.And other people including myself can appreciate much higher dynamic range from the night mode.Also keep in mind that if you don't use night mode the amount of details from P20 Pro's photo is similar to those from S9 but with the dynamic range still as good as Pixel 2.
Nope, without night mode the details are still oversharpened and fake, they're not convincing at 10mp, just look at the branches, the way thinner branches are fainter than thicker branches is what they're supposed to look like to a resolution limited sensor, the way the p20pro renders it is like charcoal sketching, you obviously don't have an idea huawei real detail looks like, and seem oblivious to the smear.
Please login or register.Manufacturers Apple Samsung Asus Amazon.Iphone tools Tablet finder New tablets Popular tablets Compare tablets.Being what my colleagues p20 describe as a "photography aficionado" a.
So, naturally, I couldn't wait til I got my hands on the P20 Pro and took it out for some night-time photos, along with some of the other top-shelf smartphone cameras.And so I did, and now there are questions that I want and will try to answer about P20 Pro's low-light performance.
Is it really the best? Or is it great in some areas, while not as decent in others? The answers to these questions and more, you will find here! Before we begin huawei comparison-proper, and before p20 can answer the question posed above, we should take a better look at how P20 Pro's much touted "Night" camera mode works.
To see how it differs from the normal "Photo" mode, I decided to start out pro taking two shots in pro two different modes before iphone got completely dark huawei. Turns out, this is a great way to get a better idea of how "Night" mode actually works, as some of the things it does become much less apparent when there's no light left in the sky.
So, let's have a look at these two images:.The p20 takes multiple photos at different iphone, starting at underexposed, through properly exposed, then overexposed.This is called exposure bracketing and is done so that, when the images are blended, the software can pull detail in the shadows from the overexposed shots, and pro in the highlights from the underexposed images.
This process takes 5 seconds and image resolution is limited to 10MP.
The exposures are then blended or stacked to create an HDR image Aggressive noise reduction is applied The result is "sharpened" by applying local contrast and structure adjustments.These mostly affect the midtones and create the illusion of a sharper image.
Huawei you can pro from the example above, Huawei's processing techniques p20 quite aggressive, though they do help when shooting in very poor lighting.This example serves only to better illustrate what's happening iphone the curtains, as very dark environments don't lend themselves quite as well to granular inspection.
That said, we are going to be shooting in "Night" mode on the P20 Pro for the rest p20 this comparison, as iphone is the intended mode to use when shooting at night.However, we'll also try out the regular "Photo" mode in some scenes, and even enable the 40MP setting, which is otherwise unavailable when shooting pro "Night" mode.
With all this said, let's now begin the actual comparison to see how the Huawei P20 Pro stacks up against pro best smartphone cameras on the market when it comes to night-time photography.As is customary in our low-light shoot-outs, we are starting out at twilight.
This way, we can see how p20 performance of each camera changes as we move huawei dusk, and then cut to the chase when night falls.The iPhone X has blown out the highlights in the sky, but at least it's preserved detail in the shadows in the foreground, whereas the Iphone Pro has produced an overly dark, muddled image, albeit with a properly exposed sky.
Scene 2 gives us a better glimpse at iphone the four phones handle bright, direct lights.And surprisingly, there's quite a difference between the four.Starting from p20 to best: Thanks to exposure bracketing, the Huawei manages to pull this huawei off with the least amount of flaring.
As far as detail is concerned, performance is comparable across all four devices, although the P20 Pro photo has some visibly more accentuated textures than the rest.The road and huawei sidewalk, for example, have this grittier look to them in the P20 Pro shot, which makes these areas appear more pro when viewed on the phone's 6-inch display.
Here, the P20 Pro produces a completely noise-free image, albeit at the cost of some finer details.Examining the P20 Pro photo from up close, especially solid-colored areas, you can see that there is no noise.However, comparing it to the S9 shot, we can see that this comes at the cost of an all-around softer image across the entire frame.
Whether you like it or not, is up to you.